Daily Archives: June 4, 2010
I have critically read most of the articles on your site and the reactions to them as well. I admire the optimism that is fairly abounding in them. But your optimism is utopist. My criticism is rooted in the disjoint I see from the reality of the situation of the state of Nigeria to the often placating analysis that I see on your site. read more »
“Since the death instinct exists in the heart of everything that lives … let us unfasten the ties that bind us to life, let us cultivate our death wish, let us develop it, water it like a plant, let it grow unhindered” Eugene Lonesco
We are a nation with a death wish. Please pardon my pessimism. Anybody who has followed my writings in this forum can vouch that I am an incurable optimist when it comes to the future of Nigeria. But it is often said that lunacy is losing perception of reality. Our realities as a nation paint a depressing and discouraging picture. read more »
Private capital flows, which in 2007 had surged to $53 billion—for the first time exceeding foreign aid to the continent—are declining. Since last year, African stock markets have fallen by an average of 40 percent, with some such as Nigeria’s falling by over 60 percent. Ghana and Kenya have postponed sovereign bond offerings worth over $800 million, delaying the construction of toll-roads and gas pipelines. The Democratic Republic of Congo has lowered its expected foreign direct investment by $1.8 billion. These flows were financing much-needed infrastructure and commodity-based investments. More importantly, the surge in capital inflows had raised expectations that African economies had “turned the corner”—only to have those expectations deflated for reasons that are not remotely the fault of Africans. Remittances, which had peaked at about $20 billion a year in 2008, are expected to decline by 4.4 percent this year. Typically, remittances are counter-cyclical: when your family is having difficulties, you send them more money. But this time the crisis is in the remittance-sending countries. Over 77 percent of Africa’s remittances come from the U.S. and Western Europe.
The third channel is foreign aid. Although donors increased aid to Africa in 2008, they are already $20 billion short of the commitments made in Gleneagles in 2005—commitments made when the global economy was more robust. Today, fiscal pressures to stimulate the donors’ own economies are mounting. If we draw lessons from the 1990s financial crises in Norway, Sweden and Finland, foreign aid could fall substantially. A cutback in foreign aid could make the difference between life and death for, among others, the two million HIV-positive Africans on anti-retroviral therapies.
Fourth, the rapid decline in commodity prices, although a benefit to Africa’s oil importers, is causing a major decline in exports and government revenues in the many commodity exporters. Even those oil exporters who saved their windfall oil revenues in 2008 (Angola, Gabon and Nigeria all used a reference price of oil of about $57 a barrel when the market price was $140) are suffering because their non-oil sector is both very small and highly dependent on government expenditures. Angola’s GDP is expected to decline by 23 percent in nominal terms. Exporters of other commodities, such as Zambia, DRC and South Africa, are experiencing a substantial drop in export revenues and, in some cases, fiscal revenues as well.
In addition, several African countries entered the global financial crisis with significant macroeconomic imbalances. Ethiopia’s inflation rate in July 2008 was 60 percent; Ghana’s fiscal deficit was 14 percent of GDP. South Africa’s current account deficit, which was financed largely from private capital flows, was 8 percent of GDP.
The net result is that Africa’s GDP will grow at about 2.4 percent in 2009, about two and a half percentage points slower than in 2008. While 2.4 percent growth is higher than the zero or negative growth being forecast for the United States or Europe, a two- to three-percentage-point drop in growth could have devastating consequences for a low-income region.
Until 2008, African countries had been experiencing—for the first time in two decades—sustained economic growth equal to that of all developing countries (outside China and India). Thanks to sound economic policies and rising commodity prices, Africa’s growth had been accelerating from 5.7 percent in 2006 to 6.1 percent in 2007 and a projected 6.4 percent in 2008. Poverty was declining and many human-development indicators—notably the prevalence of HIV/AIDS—were improving. Now the hopes created by this decade-long surge in growth are being dashed. Political and social unrest may follow.
Furthermore, Africa’s recent economic growth was due at least in part to the economic reforms that policymakers undertook during the previous decade. There is a good chance that political support for these reforms will wane. That most developed countries are undertaking what look like “reverse reforms”—bank nationalization, deficit-increasing public spending programs—will make it harder to sustain reform momentum in Africa.
Finally, the global economic crisis could lead to a human crisis in Africa. If Africa experiences a growth deceleration that is typical of the past, we estimate that an additional 700,000 infants will die before their first birthday.
Question (asked by someone when I made a presentation along these lines at the World Bank): If all this is true, why was there so little additional aid for Africa in the G-20 communiqué? I’d be interested to hear what you think.
read more »
It never rains but it pours is a famous English legend, running from the days of English physician, John Arbuthnot and the writer, Jonathan Swift. For Nigeria, misfortune has been pouring. First, the President, the symbol of Nigeria’s power and dignity, became so sick he had to be evacuated for medical treatment. He is not receiving medical treatment in Nigeria but in an unfashionable Saudi Arabia because for decades Nigerian leaders have not established comparable medical facilities. He has been ill and incommunicado for more than a month. No one has seen any image of our beloved president. No one, that is, except his wife and physicians attending to him, can say he is alive. We can’t even say he is sentient enough to take the decisions attributed to him. We only rely on the say-so of public officials and relatives whose credibility and public spiritedness are below zero. Few situations can be more traumatic than the situation surrounding the incomprehensible sickness of our president. read more »
Everybody talks about the problems with Nigeria; not just Nigerians, but foreigners too, from both poles of the earth, friends and foes alike. Often we hear that our government officials are corrupt, our people are impoverished, our economy is static and moribund, Infrastructural maintenance is appalling, our schools are dead, our media is not free, and rule of law is void. All of these admonitions are by all means now vaulted clichés repeatedly descended to us on high sounding phrases and unattainable banners. This brief article is compelled by all, but most especially to make a case for ease and redirect the kernels to the grasping tooth of us mere mortals, for after all we all know they are true. read more »
In time past, the world has always come together to fight a common threat to their existence, be it fascism, Nazism, Racism, Slavery, and diseases of all kinds. Terrorism must be seen and classified also as a common foe that must be fought to a stand still, before it consumes us all. For now it is looking as if it is an America problem alone but far from it, for we have a saying in Africa that when people see others carrying a dead corpse pass their compound, they might make the mistake thinking it is a log of wood. The point am trying to make is that, no Nation or people are immune to this evil called “Terrorism” that it has not affected you yet does not mean that it will not. read more »
First, the banking sector makes up close to 50% of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE)’S market Capitalization. This level of concentration in the banking sector continues to pose a significant degree of systemic risk. This is wrong. The NSE should have triggers to ensure that the exchange is not out of balance in sector weights. Some of these banks as Sanusi noted used accounting gimmicks to falsify there books and records. Financial statements can no longer be relied on. Internal audit processes are weak. External auditors can skew results as unqualified once bank officers make contributions to the informal economy via unethical and corrupt practices.
The Lagos all share indexes has dropped close to 70% in 2007. There are ethical issues with trade positions and non public material information being made public to a few insiders. Sanusi is right because bankers all over the world have caused the public to lose confidence and while other nations like the US is taking steps to reduce systemic risk; some analysts in Nigeria fear that Sanusi has not struck the right tone. These analysts are wrong and are more than likely complicit in the growth of the pseudo informal economy that needs to be either formalized or eliminated.
Banks have accumulated bad debt on their books and do not have adequate loan reserve provisions. Nigerian Banks have used off balance sheet accounting and multiple special purpose vehicles (SPV)’s to hide losses and pad profits. Ethics and risk management needs to be the backbone of the executive cadre of banks. Creating risk management processes and formalized risk governance methods must be demanded by the new CBN chief. Executives must consider ethics in making business decisions and work to foster the best in class model at all there lines of business. Risk and ethics must be the responsibility of not only the executives but everyone.
CBN cannot set monetary policy, regulate and enforce them. The line among who sets fiscal policy has been largely a gray area for the most part. Since lawmakers do not understand the implications of the laws that they pass and look to the bankers for guidance. This circle has to be broken if the capital market must work; and indeed it must if Nigeria wants to become a player in the global economy where competition, innovation and protection of intellectual property thrives and will always reign supreme. Sanusi must bring a whip with teeth to the banking sector. Soludo brought a whip without teeth and has lead us to this warm pot. Sanusi must make sure the pot does not get hot and systemically burn down the entire capital market system.
Secondly, if the Nigeria banks are controlled by the government, then by all means Sanusi can remove the executives that have not served the interest of their shareholders. He would be negligent and unethical if he did not remove these CEO’s. In simple term banks carry consumer deposits as liabilities on there books and issue loans as receivable for which they pay interest on the liabilities and receive interest on the loans. They access fees for continued operations and issue stock to raise capital and grow. The growth can be organic or via acquisitions or mergers. That is simple enough correct? So what is the issue? For the new CBN governors threat to hold sway it is either the major deposits are controlled by the government or the shareholders have no say. If the later is the case, then we are doomed.
Banks such as UBA, Zenith, Oceanic, First Bank, have to look for ways of innovating and creating products that meet the needs of consumers in there home country before seeking greener pastures on other shores. If the demand conditions for the products they offer forces it to move offshore then so be it. If these banks do not innovate they will die. The global economic will I hope level the playing field but for these to happen each of the CEO must recognize that they must compete for the dollar or should I say the Naira; they must put the processes in place to foster growth.
We need a good payment system on a strong scalable technological platform that can sync with developed economies in a timely manner. The depository and clearing houses must be effective and have the full support of the Banks to invest in better delivery systems and R & D. We must develop a maintenance culture one that rewards long sustainability and infrastructural development. Africa and indeed Nigeria cannot survive in the global market place where India can perform all and every process for a fraction of the cost it takes in Nigeria. We need to develop technology and invest a portion of the profit banks make in research and development.
The question for us all and I hope you grapple with this; I know I do, is how we solve these issues. I would argue that it starts from the top with regulators who set standards and the premier monetary policy executive Mr. Sanusi has began the process by setting a welcome tone for all. We should all salute his courage, encourage it and ensure it is followed up with set “rules of the road”. These rules must be clear. These rules must be without “quid pro quo”. These rules must meet international standards and rebuild confidence in the capital market.
read more »
|